Home > O Error > End_request I/o Error Dev Sda Sector Dd

End_request I/o Error Dev Sda Sector Dd

Contents

SCT Feature Control supported. The first thing I did then was to look at the status of the drive, with -a: # ./smartctl -a /dev/sda smartctl 6.2 2013-07-26 r3841 [x86_64-linux-3.11-2-amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-13, Please tell me how to fix this, any help is appreciated. Before buying the powered USB hub, it gave the same problem (back then it was using a raspbmc distribution with kernel 3.12 but the errors in dmesg were similar/identical). http://deepfrom.com/o-error/end-request-i-o-error-dev-sr0-sector.html

I'm around 12hrs in and expect it to take another 24/48 hours as the disk is so large: e2fsck -c -c -p -v /dev/sdc1 My question is: Is this drive failing, An additional thing: both the hard disk work just fine under Windows (and also under Linux on my workstation) even under heavy load... Use the FAQ Luke Top 1885 Posts: 110 Joined: 2014/10/25 13:33:03 Re: blk_update_request: I/0 error, dev sda, sector 220473440 Quote Postby 1885 » 2015/12/18 14:11:58 TrevorH wrote:No bone, it's a dying Why aren't Muggles extinct? check here

I O Error Dev Sda Sector Linux

Supports SMART auto save timer. In frozen state, there's not much you can do beside reading and writing data to the disk. No Auto Offline data collection support. MeeGeeVee commented Apr 17, 2015 In my case it was 100% power related.

Writing referee report: found major error, now what? If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay. zeroing out the entire partition (should alert the disk of the bad blocks ... Blk_update_request I/o Error Dev Sr0 I did fix some errors in the filesystem, so maybe that is the root cause of the buffer I/O errors.

Upgrading the firmware was extremely painful: they do not seem to provide a linux upgrade utility, and the windows version... End_request I/o Error Dev Sector I just said goodbye to a few hundred dollars to welcome a Corsair Force GS on my laptop, and been happy ever after. General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x03) Offline data collection activity is in progress. https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2048100 In the thread I linked above, someone recommended doing a "Complete drive test" with a certain Ultimate Boot CD.

pelwell commented Apr 24, 2015 FYI, Adafruit have released a tutorial on adding an external HDD to a Pi, and they say: The Raspberry Pi doesn't have enough power to run End_request I/o Error Dev Sda Sector 0 And beware, a secure wipe will, well, wipe all your data. We were wondering is this still an issue > for you? Will this give me some answers?

End_request I/o Error Dev Sector

NOTE : I'm sorry, I made a mistake, the correct while condition is like this : while [ "$(smartctl -l selective ${baddrive} | awk '/^ *1/{print $4}')" = "Self_test_in_progess" ]; do http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/99553/does-a-bad-sector-indicate-a-failing-disk reading specific ordinary files (for instance ~/.config/dconf/user) resulted in an I/O error. I O Error Dev Sda Sector Linux Not the answer you're looking for? Blk_update_request I/o Error Dev Sector Get a replacement if you can.

Browse other questions tagged linux hdparm bad-blocks smartctl or ask your own question. useful reference Before doing a secure erase, however, I wanted to test if the new firmware provided any benefits, and sure it did. Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled. Standard way for novice to prevent small round plug from rolling away while soldering wires to it Question from Mark Twain's quote Invariants of higher genus curves more hot questions question Blk_update_request I/o Error Dev Fd0 Sector 0

No Offline surface scan supported. After command completion occurred, registers were: ER ST SC SN CL CH DH -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 40 51 03 1d 2a 97 ec Error: UNC 3 sectors Log sense failed, IE page [scsi response fails sanity test] Error counter logging not supported ... ... my review here f18m commented Apr 18, 2015 By the way I still haven't solved this problem.

Some forums suggested to use dd to overwrite the sector by computing its offset and size manually, which would force the drive to relocate it, and the test to continue. Blk_update_request I/o Error Dev Sr0 Sector My HDD is attached to a SATA-to-USB adaptor and it shows this exact same behaviour. Razican commented Apr 29, 2015 I can confirm (almost 100% sure) that it is not power related.

So, find a machine with Windows I could use, install the Corsair utilities for SSD support, connect the SSD, and upgrade the firmware (to version 5.24, in my case).

smartctrl said that the drive was healthy, but that there had been errors, so I replaced the drive with another identical drive by using a similar command to the above, but Leave ns1066 far away from Raspberry PI. Opts: (null) [ 13.904700] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p2): re-mounted. Blk_update_request I/o Error Vmware Opts: (null) [ 17.721979] FAT-fs (mmcblk0p1): Volume was not properly unmounted.

I cannot try external power y-cable - don't have one and also, since it has the drive has been working flawelessly on Pi B using internal power for well over a How do hackers find the IP address of devices? Select the disk and run a short or long test in addition to viewing any errors the hd is reporting. get redirected here Second, running smartctl -t long /dev/sda now did not brick the drive!

General Purpose Logging supported. Use the FAQ Luke Top 1885 Posts: 110 Joined: 2014/10/25 13:33:03 Re: blk_update_request: I/0 error, dev sda, sector 220473440 Quote Postby 1885 » 2015/12/18 16:56:28 My plan: Back up data.Pull dirve:Install Leaving a half-answer as a comment can often cause more harm than good. General Purpose Logging supported.

James Collier (james-collier412) wrote on 2008-08-30: #3 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. The rsync command line looked something like: # rsync -avz --delete --progress --checksum --itemize-changes --dry-run \ --exclude=/run/ --exclude=/proc/ --exclude=/sys/ --exclude=/dev/ \ --exclude=/var/lock/ --exclude=/mnt/ --exclude=/var/log/ \ /mnt/backup / The important options here I tried to test the disk with (all 3: extended, conveyance, short) smartmontool tests. But my filesystem is xfs, so fsck simply refuses to run professing that I should be using xfs_repair - which does not have the option to work together with badblocks.

If you receive this e-mail in error, please so notify the sender and delete or destroy the material from any media. sleep 5 done echo badsect=$(smartctl -l selective ${baddrive} | awk '/# 1 Selective offline Completed: read failure/ {print $10}') [ $badsect = "-" ] && exit 0 echo Attempting to fix Subscribing... popcornmix commented Apr 24, 2015 Pi2 can use more power that Pi1, so I don't think you can infer a power supply that is good for Pi1 is necessarily good for

Most SMART capable disks, however, allow to run a self test to verify the integrity and state of a disk. Why use a Zener in a regular as opposed to a regular diode? Blindfreddy commented Apr 21, 2015 I have the same error using a WD 2TB USB3 disk, refer https://www.google.de/url?url=https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/885&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&sa=U&ei=qz82VZIhwaewAYDNgKAN&ved=0CBoQFjAB&sig2=OFhTaepwrroA5QRZuaWnUQ&usg=AFQjCNEzwcQ-hGcApolnu3RnIxP6Et4JdA HDD: DetailsHDD D iManufacturer 1 Western Digital iProduct 2 My Passport 0748 I CentOS The Community ENTerprise Operating System Skip to content Search Advanced search Quick links Unanswered posts Active topics Search The team FAQ Login Register Board index CentOS 7 CentOS 7 -

But first thing I wanted to know was...